Bike Magazine - Britain's Best-Selling Motorcycle Magazine Home

Search
   
Members

Calendar

Help

Home
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 


Tail Packs
 Moderated by: MFG, KhalH, karTER  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
nas
Forum Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 13
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 11:00 am

Quote

Reply
On a recent trip to germany, my tail pack came off at around 90ish and locked the back wheel- I managed to keep the bike upright just- but the skid destroyed my clothes and back tyre.

I then spoke to a mate in trading standards who told me about the death of girl caused by a tail pack, then when i was in motorbike shop, the sales man told me about one of the staff who lost most of the use of his arm because of the same thing-


What I want to know is, are tailpacks taking us out one by one....?

Mav
Forum Member


Joined: Thu Nov 23rd, 2006
Location: En Route To Nowhere
Posts: 11169
Occupation: Heretic Igniter
My bikes: very very black n sexy
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 11:59 am

Quote

Reply
never heard about it myself - but will not use a tail pack for this reason.

(Not one that is deep enough to touch tyre while still attached to seat anyway)



____________________
The first convert of many to the new improved protestant reformation.


Counter steering is the work of the Devil!
nas
Forum Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 13
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 01:09 pm

Quote

Reply
The thing was it was actually quite shallow, the thing just flipped around.

Until then I had not actually heard any horror stories- alhtough I would now alway recommend anyone against them

TimmyMagic
Forum Member


Joined: Wed Aug 16th, 2006
Location: Bedford, England
Posts: 5714
Occupation: IT bod
My bikes: CCM R30S
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 01:13 pm

Quote

Reply
You could say the same about soft luggage though...



____________________
Supermoto: Mirror, Signal, Sliiiiiide....
nas
Forum Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 13
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 01:20 pm

Quote

Reply
I think that anything near the back wheel is pretty dangerous- although tankbags stop you tucking in, I would choose it everytime.

It just not worth the risk to me, although i think i was unlikly in knowing three people effected by them,

dooley
Forum Member


Joined: Sat Jun 2nd, 2007
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3914
Occupation: 3rd rate shamus
My bikes: CBF600CTDi
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 01:26 pm

Quote

Reply
did the tail pack fail? or was it just not secured properly



____________________
"And I wonder how long I'll hang around
Before I go insane
Before I break down
And get gone again"
kraftwerk
Forum Member


Joined: Mon Aug 14th, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1159
Occupation: Head of acq
My bikes: Blackbird, X11, FireBlade
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 02:37 pm

Quote

Reply
I've read bad stories about tail packs in the press. Get a rack and box. Probably get them on eBay for under £100.



____________________
We are programmed just to do, anything you want us to.... We are The Robots
nas
Forum Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 13
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 02:47 pm

Quote

Reply
I think its is something Bike should look into- from the feedback i am getting from my biking mates- its kind of urban legend type thing- someone knows someone whose mate died-

I work for publishing house, which archives pretty much all the newspapers in the UK, so i am just about to run a search and see if anything pops up there, will let you know.

I thought about a rack- if i had to put something on the back ever again, its probably what i would use,

devonrider
Banned
 

Joined: Mon May 5th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 26
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 02:50 pm

Quote

Reply
Lot's of things can hurt or kill riders.

Not securing soft luggage properly is one of them.:?

nas
Forum Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 13
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 02:57 pm

Quote

Reply
I agree- getting on a bike is dangerous- and although I do lots of stupid things on a bike, i was on the way to nurburg ring when it happend.

I like to try and reduce as many risks as possible- 

In regards to securing the thing- I am 100% sure it was on properly- I knew i would be hitting high speeds on the auto barn so i checked an double checked everything-

I have just run a search across a news database and I came up with this:

 

 

A MOTORBIKE parts company could face a charge of manslaughter after a police chief's daughter was killed in a crash.Jenny Brereton, 20, died when a luggage pannier on her 600cc motorbike worked loose causing her to lose control. Her father Bill Brereton, 47, the Deputy Chief Constable of North Wales Police, was following behind on his own motorbike.Motorcycle enthusiast Jenny died of multiple injuries a week afterthe crash on the M53 near Liverpool in May last year.Accessory firm Oxford Products, the manufacturers of the pannier, could face a charge of corporate manslaughter over Jenny's death.A Merseyside Police spokeswoman said, ``The crash investigation focused on the safety aspects of a luggage tail-pack fitted to the motorbike. ``A file has been sent to the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to possible offences which may have been committed by the manufacturers of the tailpack.''An inquest into Jenny's death has been adjourned while the CPS considered the case. A North Wales Police spokeswoman said Mr Brereton did not wish to comment on the matter at this stage. 

kraftwerk
Forum Member


Joined: Mon Aug 14th, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1159
Occupation: Head of acq
My bikes: Blackbird, X11, FireBlade
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 02:59 pm

Quote

Reply
nas wrote: I think its is something Bike should look into- from the feedback i am getting from my biking mates- its kind of urban legend type thing- someone knows someone whose mate died-

I work for publishing house, which archives pretty much all the newspapers in the UK, so i am just about to run a search and see if anything pops up there, will let you know.

I thought about a rack- if i had to put something on the back ever again, its probably what i would use,
RiDE has run many stories and tests on tailpacks



____________________
We are programmed just to do, anything you want us to.... We are The Robots
Mav
Forum Member


Joined: Thu Nov 23rd, 2006
Location: En Route To Nowhere
Posts: 11169
Occupation: Heretic Igniter
My bikes: very very black n sexy
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 03:40 pm

Quote

Reply
kraftwerk wrote: Get a rack and box.

Hmmmmmmmmmm dead with a tail pack or dead with a top box...............

Not sure that is a good swap tbh :D:D:D



____________________
The first convert of many to the new improved protestant reformation.


Counter steering is the work of the Devil!
johnktm
Forum Member


Joined: Thu Apr 3rd, 2008
Location: Maryport, United Kingdom
Posts: 373
Occupation: fitter
My bikes: SuperDuke
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 03:41 pm

Quote

Reply
Back pack?



____________________
popping and banging on the overrun
nas
Forum Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 13
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 03:46 pm

Quote

Reply
I am not going to take luggage any more... how long can you wear the same set of pants before it become stilton...

devonrider
Banned
 

Joined: Mon May 5th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 26
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 03:48 pm

Quote

Reply
So what actually happened in your case ?

You don't actually say.

Was it a broken strap ? What exactly ?

Oh by the way, that case you posted, bought against Oxford is many years old. Oxford were cleared.

Last edited on Tue May 6th, 2008 03:49 pm by devonrider

kraftwerk
Forum Member


Joined: Mon Aug 14th, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1159
Occupation: Head of acq
My bikes: Blackbird, X11, FireBlade
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 03:51 pm

Quote

Reply
Mav wrote: Hmmmmmmmmmm dead with a tail pack or dead with a top box...............
Not sure that is a good swap tbh :D:D:D
Never heard of (nor had) any problems with a top box - enlighten me.



____________________
We are programmed just to do, anything you want us to.... We are The Robots
nas
Forum Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 13
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 04:01 pm

Quote

Reply
do you work for oxford....

I have just checked the case and they didnt win they lost-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/north_west/2939265.stm

On a serious note- I really dont know what happend- the one thing that is sure is that it was definalty tied on properly- I was travelling along at around 90ish when i heard an exploson-

I thought it was a blow out so I just let the bike coast to stop,

When i got off the bike, the tail pack was jammed under the rear fender and was on fire-

Somthing must have snapped the whole thing went backwards and ripped off of the number plate and rear tail holder, and with the speed i was going it should not have snapped!

 

mph999
Forum Member


Joined: Wed Dec 12th, 2007
Location: KT17 1LP, United Kingdom
Posts: 359
Occupation: lurking
My bikes: average > 40 mpg
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 04:05 pm

Quote

Reply
90ish - there's yer prob....or a dodgy bungie



____________________
there are only three sports in life:
mountaineering, bullfighting and motorsport.
the rest are merely games.

attributed to Ernest Hemingway
nas
Forum Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 13
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 04:14 pm

Quote

Reply
I think you are probably right, I think the speed was probably the cause.. the reason i started the thread was because how many of us actually travel below 90- 

Maybe it was stupidity on my behalf, but i would have assumed they would be good for  anything below 120ish

I would definatly not get one again,

devonrider
Banned
 

Joined: Mon May 5th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 26
Occupation: 
My bikes: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 11:55 pm

Quote

Reply
nas wrote: do you work for oxford....

I have just checked the case and they didnt win they lost-



 

No it wasn't that straight forward, as your link illustrates.

Oxford were cleared of producing a faulty product, but admitted that the lack of instructions may have contributed to the accident.

In other words, the tail pack itself was not faulty and certainly not dangerous in itself, which your initial post implied.

It was simply incorrectly fitted.

I'm sorry but this is a clear case of the blame culture we live in, where if we make a mistake, it must be someone elses fault.

Many years ago I had an explosion in one of my throwover panniers that blew a hole out of the bottom, causing all my stuff inside to get scattered all over the motorway.

Was it the makers fault for not giving me proper instructions, or was it mine for being stupid enough to put my aerosol deodrant and shaving foam at the bottom nearest the hot exhaust.

Let's get real here.

There are no inherant dangers in soft luggage, other that some peoples incompetance when it come to fitting it including mine on that day, but at least I'm not too proud, (or arrogant), to admit it.

Last edited on Wed May 7th, 2008 12:07 am by devonrider


 Current time is 06:58 pm
Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez